On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:55 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > How about saying that you must give an opclass name if you want to > specify options, ie the syntax is > > [ opclass_name [ ( options... ) ] ] > > I'm not necessarily wedded to that, but it seems worth throwing > out the idea.
Agreed, that's not bad, certainly better than making OPTIONS more reserved. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
