Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > I suggest ALTER TABLE should respond to a parameter setting of ddl_dry_run > = on, so the whole world doesn't need to rewrite its syntax to support the > new option.
We were just busy shooting down a different suggestion of
behavior-changing GUCs. A GUC that turns all ALTERs into no-ops
sure seems like a foot-gun to me.
regards, tom lane
