On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:35 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Hm. It *could*, if we wanted it to run some transactions after > finishing recovery.
It'd have to launch a separate process per database. That would be useful infrastructure for other things, too, like automatic catalog upgrades in minor releases, but I'm not volunteering to write that infrastructure right now. > Alternatively, maybe we could have backends flag whether they've > taken ownership of their temp schemas or not, and let autovacuum > flush old temp tables if not? Yes, that seems like a possibly promising approach. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
