Hi, On 2018-12-14 22:54:14 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Dec-13, Tom Lane wrote: > > Looking at the existing entries, it seems like we'd have to have > > one special case: schema public has OID 2200 but is intentionally > > not pinned. I wouldn't have a hard time with teaching isObjectPinned > > about that; though if it turns out that many places need to know > > about it, maybe it's not workable. > > Why not just move that OID outside the Genbki special range? I have > seen quite a few installs where schema public was removed and later > re-added. I've never seen a query hardcode OID 2200, and I'd call one > which does buggy.
+1 Greetings, Andres Freund
