Hi > út 18. 12. 2018 v 16:11 odesílatel Filip Rembiałkowski > <filip.rembialkow...@gmail.com> napsal: >> Please share opinions if this makes sense at all, and has any chance >> going upstream.
Clearly since Pavel has another implementation of the same concept, there is some interest in this feature. :) On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:20 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Still one my customer use a patch that implement FORCE on SQL level. It is > necessary under higher load when is not easy to synchronize clients. I think Filip's approach of setting pg_database.datallowconn='false' is pretty clever to avoid the synchronization problem. But it's also a good idea to expose this functionality via DROP DATABASE in SQL, like Pavel's patch, not just the 'dropdb' binary. If this is to be accepted into PostgreSQL core, I think the two approaches should be combined on the server side. Regards, Marti Raudsepp
