Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 05:55:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It appears to me that the code is intentionally not worrying about
>> fsync failure, so it seems wrong for it to FATAL out if it's unable
>> to open the file to fsync it. And it surely shouldn't do so if the
>> file isn't there.
> My point is a bit different though: it seems to me that we could just
> call BasicOpenFilePerm() and remove the stat() to do exactly the same
> things, simplifying the code.
Oh, I see. Yeah, if we're ignoring errors anyway, the stat calls
seem redundant.
regards, tom lane
