On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 11:55:43AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Renaming applications shouldn't be a problem unless they have to be > moved from one binary package to another. I assume all packagers ship > all client/server binaries in one package, respectively (and not e.g. a > dedicated postgresql-11-pg_test_fsync package), this should only be a > matter of updating package metadata. > > In any case, it should be identical to the xlog->wal rename.
I have poked -packagers on the matter and I am seeing no complains, so let's move forward with this stuff. From the consensus I am seeing on the thread, we have been discussing about the following points: 1) Rename pg_verify_checksums to pg_checksums. 2) Have separate switches for each action, aka --verify, --enable and --disable, or a unified --action switch which can take different values. 3) Do we want to imply --verify by default if no switch is specified? About 2), folks who have expressed an opinion are: - Multiple switches: Robert, Fabien, Magnus - Single --action switch: Michael B, Michael P About 3), aka --verify implied if no action is specified: - In favor: Fabien C, Magnus - Against: Michael P If I missed what someone said, please feel free to complete with your votes here. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
