Stephen Frost wrote: > * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > > Clearly, not having to do that at all is better, but if this is all > > there is to it, then I'm confused by the characterizations of how awful > > and terrible this feature is and how we must rush to remove it. > > It's not all there is to it though. > > This issue leads to extended downtime regularly and is definitely a huge > 'gotcha' for users, even if you don't want to call it outright broken,
Only if PostgreSQL crashes regularly, right? Yours, Laurenz Albe
