On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:59:31PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > That's my opinion too, but I was outvoted in another subthread -- see > https://postgr.es/m/20181214144529.wvmjwmy7wxgmgyb3@alvherre.pgsql > Stephen Frost, Andrew Gierth and Andres Freund all voted to put > CONCURRENTLY outside the parens. It seems we now have three votes to > put it *in* the parens (you, Peter Eisentraut, me). I guess more votes > are needed to settle this issue.
Sure, let's see. I would have been in the crowd of not using parenthetised grammar five years ago, but the recent deals with other commands worry me, as we would repeat the same errors. > My opinion is that if we had had parenthesized options lists back when > CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was invented, we would have put it there. > But we were young and needed the money ... :) -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
