Latest patch, simpler but answers the key questions as code comments On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 6:56 AM Chris Travers <chris.trav...@adjust.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:46 PM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthali...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:10 PM Chris Travers <chris.trav...@adjust.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> More generally, I'd like this material to be code comments. It's the >> >> kind of stuff that gets outdated before long if it's kept separate. >> > >> > The problem is that code comments are not going to be good places to >> document "how do I check for pending actions?" That could be moved to the >> main SGML I guess..... >> >> I aggree with Peter here, for me it also feels more natural to have this >> information as code commentaries - at least if I would search for it that >> would >> be my first thought. As for "how do I..." part, I think there are alreasy >> similar commentaries in the code, which makes sense - this kind of >> questions >> usually appear when you're reading/writing some code. >> >> It doesn't look like there is much left to do in this discussion, but for >> now >> I'll move it to the next CF. >> > > Ok will move this into code comments if there are no objections. > > > -- > Best Regards, > Chris Travers > Head of Database > > Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com > Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin > > -- Best Regards, Chris Travers Head of Database Tel: +49 162 9037 210 | Skype: einhverfr | www.adjust.com Saarbrücker Straße 37a, 10405 Berlin
signal-comments.patch
Description: Binary data
