>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: >> I propose that it should not ignore rowMarks, per the attached patch or >> something similar. Tom> +1 for not ignoring rowMarks, but this patch seems like a hack to Tom> me. Why didn't you just add RowMarkClause as one of the known Tom> alternative expression node types? Because it's not an expression and nothing anywhere else in the backend treats it as such? -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)