Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't think we are actually contradicting each other. The aim of that
> error was to prevent pieces of code that aren't conditional on
> --with-llvm from including llvmjit.h. I was, for a moment and wrongly,
> thinking that we could style the header in a way that'd make it both for
> safe for cpluspluscheck and still error in that case, but that was a
> brainfart. But even leaving that brainfart aside, I'm not arguing
> against adding those include guards, so ...?
Works for me now. Thanks for fixing.
regards, tom lane
