Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > Hm. That looks sane to me at quick glance. I am a bit on the edge > regaring the naming "FullTransactionId", which is actually a 64-bit > value with a 32-bit XID and a 32-bit epoch. Something like > TransactionIdWithEpoch or EpochTransactionId sounds a bit better to > me. My point is that "Full" is too generic for that.
WideTransactionId, maybe? I agree that "Full" seems like a poor
adjective here.
regards, tom lane
