Hi, On 2019/02/06 19:14, Michael Paquier wrote: >> Given that a couple (?) of other patches depend on this, maybe it'd be a >> good idea to proceed with this. > > If you are happy with the version attached, I am fine to commit it. I > think that we have the right semantics and the right test coverage for > this patch.
Yeah, I agree. Should also check with Alvaro maybe? Thanks, Amit
