On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:06:27PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Probably right. I figured it would be useful to see what the outcome is > with primary_conninfo, so they can be treated similarly.
The interactions with waiting for WAL to be available and the WAL receiver stresses me a bit for restore_command, as you could finish with the startup process switching to use restore_command with a WAL receiver still working behind and overwriting partially the recovered segment, which could lead to corruption. We should be *very* careful about that. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
