Hi Amit, From: Amit Langote [mailto:langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp] > Maybe I chose the the subject line of this thread poorly when I began > working on it. It should perhaps have been something like "speeding up > planning of point-lookup queries with many partitions" or something like > that. There are important use cases beyond point lookup even with > partitioned tables (or maybe more so with partitioned tables), but perhaps > unsurprisingly, the bottlenecks in those cases are not *just* in the > planner.
No, it's simply my fault. I wasn't aware of the CF Bot and the CF entry page that act on the latest submitted patch. I'm relieved to see you have submitted the revised patch. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
