Meskes-san Thank you for your comment. I remove it and attach a new patch. Please review it. I feel sorry for asking you to reveiw without contribution.
Regards Ryo Matsumura > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Meskes [mailto:mes...@postgresql.org] > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 6:29 PM > To: Matsumura, Ryo/松村 量 <matsumura....@jp.fujitsu.com> > Cc: 'Michael Meskes' <mes...@postgresql.org>; Tsunakawa, Takayuki/綱川 貴 > 之 <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com>; pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG > > Matsumura-san, > > > Sorry to bother you, but I would be grateful if you would comment to me. > > Sorry, I didn't know you were waiting on a reply by me. > > > > I have a question about ecpg manual when I add article for bytea. > > > I wonder what does the following about VARCHAR mean. > > > ... > > > I think, if the footnote of VARCHAR is meaningless, I remove it while I > add > > > the article for bytea. (I didn't remove in this patch.) > > I have no idea where the footnote comes from, but I agree that it doesn't seem > to make sense. The datatype varchar in the C code is handled by the > preprocessor and replaced by a struct definition anyway. > > Feel free to remove. > > Michael > -- > Michael Meskes > Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) > Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org > Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org > VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL >
ecpg_bytea_v1_3.patch
Description: ecpg_bytea_v1_3.patch
