On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > 2. Or probably even better, just put it in PgBackendStatus? Overhead here > is a lot cheaper than PGPROC. > > ISTM 2 is probably the most reasonable option here?
Yes, I forgot this one. That would be more consistent, even if the information can be out of date quickly we don't care here. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
