BTW, I just pushed a fix (e04a3905e) that adds a little more code to clause_is_strict_for(). This shouldn't cause more than minor rebasing pain for you, I hope.
regards, tom lane
BTW, I just pushed a fix (e04a3905e) that adds a little more code to clause_is_strict_for(). This shouldn't cause more than minor rebasing pain for you, I hope.
regards, tom lane