On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 15:00, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Pushed that one. I'm interested by the "POC" patch, but I agree > that it'd take some research to show that it isn't a net negative > for simple queries. It sounds like you're not really interested > in pursuing that right now?
Thanks for pushing it. I'm still interested in the POC patch. I just knew it wasn't something for the back branches and thought something that was would be more important... Things having gone quiet here wasn't a good source of inspiration to do any further work on it. It's good to hear you're interested. > Anyway, I rebased the POC patch up to HEAD, just in case anyone > still wants to play with it. Cool. Thanks. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
