From: Michael Paquier [mailto:mich...@paquier.xyz] On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:59:21PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > Also, I think that this test may fail in case where concurrent > > transactions are running. So maybe should not run it in parallel to > > other tests. > > That's why autovacuum is disabled in this specific test, no? A comment > may be a good idea.
Exactly. The table is disabled for autovacuum to avoid being influenced by autovacuum. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
