On 2/25/19 1:17 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:42 PM David Rowley > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> The current default vacuum_cost_limit of 200 seems to be 15 years old >> and was added in f425b605f4e. >> >> Any supporters for raising the default? > > I also think that the current default limit is far too conservative.
I agree entirely. In my experience you are usually much better off if vacuum finishes quickly. Personally I think our default scale factors are horrible too, especially when there are tables with large numbers of rows. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
