On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:52 AM David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 03:07, Jim Finnerty <jfinn...@amazon.com> wrote: > > If you're proposing to do that for this thread then I can take my > planner only patch somewhere else. I only posted my patch as I pretty > much already had what I thought you were originally talking about. > However, please be aware there are current patents around adding > execution time smarts in this area, so it's probably unlikely you'll > find a way to do this in the executor that does not infringe on those. > Probably no committer would want to touch it. I think my patch covers > a good number of use cases and as far as I understand, does not go > near any current patents. > > Thanks for pointing out the patent concerns. I was not aware of that before. Could you please provide some clue where I can find more info about the patents? Thanks Richard
