On 2019-03-05 17:14:55 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > This patch is tiny, seems perfectly reasonable, and has plenty of > support. I'm going to commit it shortly unless there are last minute > objections.
+1
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Laurenz Albe
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Julien Rouhaud
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Robert Haas
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Laurenz Albe
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Peter Geoghegan
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_li... Tomas Vondra
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Robert Haas
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... David Rowley
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Tomas Vondra
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Andres Freund
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_li... David Rowley
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_li... Jeff Janes
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Tom Lane
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... David Rowley
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Tom Lane
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Tom Lane
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... David Rowley
- Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cos... Andrew Dunstan
