Re: Peter Eisentraut 2019-03-08 <3eb194cf-b878-1f63-8623-6d6add0ed...@2ndquadrant.com> > On 2019-02-21 10:37, Christoph Berg wrote: > > diff --git a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c > > index a18a6f6c45..8080626e94 100644 > > --- a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c > > +++ b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c > > @@ -1794,12 +1794,14 @@ run_schedule(const char *schedule, test_function > > tfunc) > > else > > { > > status(_("FAILED")); > > + status(" "); /* align with > > failed (ignored) */ > > fail_count++; > > } > > So an issue here is that in theory "FAILED" etc. are marked for > translation but your spacers do not take that into account. Personally, > I have no ambition to translate pg_regress, so we could remove all that. > But it should be done consistently in either case.
Oh, right. So the way to go would be to use _("FAILED "), and ask translators to use the same length. > I also think we shouldn't worry about the "failed (ignored)" case. That > never happens, and I don't want to mess up the spacing we have now for > that. I'd consider removing support for it altogether. You mean removing that case from pg_regress, or removing the alignment "support"? Christoph