On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:03 AM Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 7:50 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 08:03:24PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> > I see you've marked the patch as needs review - but as the patch >> > previously was marked as ready-for-committer, and I assume nothing >> > substantial has changed, I think RFC might still be the accurate state? >> >> Yes, RFC sounds good to me. I think that I could look at this patch >> and get it into shape for PG12 as that's an area I am rather familiar >> with. After that it depends on Magnus as he is registered as the >> committer of the patch. I'll be fine to jump into the ship if need >> be. >> > > Sorry, for some reason this entire thread ended up getting tracked in my > spam folder :/ Yay the new gmail antispam breakage. > > I was definitely still planning to work on it! > > The first thing I noticed is that it needed yet another rebase because of > the changes in the SSL tests. PFA an updated patch (very trivial rebase). > > (I'll keep working on it, just wanted to throw the rebased patch out there) > > Patched pushed, with some very minor formatting changes and a pgindent run. Apologies for the long processing time, and thanks again for the patch! -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
