On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > AFAICS we already maintain a hash table of the smgr relations, and we > look them up in this table. We don't need to look them up in the list of > unowned relations - the whole problem is that with the current > single-linked list, we need to iterate the list anyway to update pointer > in the preceding entry.
OK, I'm dumb. Sorry for the noise. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
