Sergei Kornilov <s...@zsrv.org> writes: >> Ugh, I guess so. Or how about changing the message itself to use >> INFO, like we already do in QueuePartitionConstraintValidation?
> Fine for me. But year ago this was implemented in my patch and Tom voted > against using INFO level for such purpose: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1142.1520362313%40sss.pgh.pa.us What I thought then was that you didn't need the message at all, at any debug level. I still think that. It might have been useful for development purposes but it does not belong in committed code. INFO (making it impossible for anybody to not have the message in-their-face) is right out. regards, tom lane
