On 3/20/19 2:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-Mar-20, Euler Taveira wrote: > >> Em qua, 20 de mar de 2019 às 14:57, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu: >>> >>> We managed to get rid of createlang and droplang in v10, and there >>> hasn't been that much push-back about it. So maybe there could be >>> a move to remove createuser/dropuser? Or at least rename them to >>> pg_createuser and pg_dropuser. But I think this was discussed >>> (again) during the v10 cycle, and we couldn't agree to do more than >>> get rid of createlang/droplang. > > Previous discussion: > https://postgr.es/m/CABUevExPrfPH5K5qM=zst7tvfyace+i5qja6bfwckkyrh8m...@mail.gmail.com > >> Votes? +1 to remove createuser/dropuser (and also createdb/dropdb as I >> said in the other email). However, if we don't have sufficient votes, >> let's at least consider a 'pg_' prefix. > > I vote to keep these rename these utilities to have a pg_ prefix and to > simultaneously install symlinks for their current names, so that nothing > breaks.
This sounds like a reasonable plan, pending which binaries we feel to do that with. Pardon this naive question as I have not used such systems in awhile, but would this work on systems that do not support symlinks? Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
