Bonjour Michaël,
Here is an attempt at improving the Notes. [...]
So, the ordering of the notes for each paragraph is as follows: 1)
Replication issues when mixing different checksum setups across nodes.
2) Consistency of the operations if killed. 3) Don't start Postgres
while the operation runs.
Your proposal is to switch the order of the paragraphs to 3), 1) and
then 2).
Yes. I suggest to emphasize cluster corruption risks by putting them
first.
Do others have any opinion? I am fine with the current
order of things, still it may make sense to tweaks the docs.
In the paragraph related to replication, the second statement is
switched to be first so as the docs warn first, and then give
recommendations.
Yep.
This part makes sense.
Yep!
I am not sure that "checksum status" is a correct term. It seems to
me that "same configuration for data checksums as before the tool ran"
or something like that would be more correct.
Possibly, I cannot say.
--
Fabien.
