Hi, all. # This is a supplement of my current patches.
> From: Nagaura, Ryohei [mailto:nagaura.ryo...@jp.fujitsu.com] > > In TCP_backend patch: > > I think this is not mentioning backend. Why don't you copy'n paste > > then modify the description of tcp_keepalives_idle? Perhaps it needs > a > > similar caveat related to Windows. I modified documentation with referring ones of tcp_keepalives_*. Also, Note that: 1) I added <note> about windows OS and some linux kernels. 2) Documentations about TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is made citing description of [1]. # The client-side patch does as well. 3) Same as keepalives*, I used both "0" and zero. I can't recognize why to use both of them. Is there anyone who know it? [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5482 Best regards, --------------------- Ryohei Nagaura
