>From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:is...@sraoss.co.jp] > >> Personally, I don't find this hint particularly necessary. The >> session was terminated because nothing was happening, so the real fix >> on the application side is probably more involved than just retrying. >> This is different from some of the other cases that were cited, such >> as serialization conflicts, where you just got unlucky due to >> concurrent events. In the case of idle-in-transaction-timeout, the >> fault is entirely your own. > >Hum. Sounds like a fair argument. Ideriha-san, what do you think? >
Hi. As Peter mentioned, application code generally needs to handle more things than retrying. So I'm ok with not adding this hint. Regards, Takeshi Ideriha
