On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 16:06, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > On 2019/04/11 12:34, David Rowley wrote: > > Now that we have 428b260f8, I think the version of this that goes into > > master should be more like the attached. > > Thanks, looks good.
Thanks for looking. > I've posted a patch last week on the "speed up partition planning" thread > [1] which modifies ddl.sgml to remove the text about UPDATE/DELETE using > constraint exclusion under the covers. Do you think there's any merit to > combining that with this one? Probably separate is better. I don't think anything you're proposing there is for back-patching, but I think the original patch over here should be. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
