Hi, On 2019-04-14 10:38:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It's entirely possible BTW that this whole business of inheriting > tablespace from the partitioned table is broken and should be thrown > out. I certainly don't see any compelling reason for partitions to > act differently from regular tables in this respect, and the more > problems we find with the idea, the less attractive it seems.
Indeed. After discovering during the tableam work, and trying to write tests for the equivalent feature for tableam, I decided that just not allowing AM specifications for partitioned tables is the right call - at least until the desired behaviour is clearer. The discussion of the last few days makes me think so even more. Greetings, Andres Freund
