On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:33:39PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > I think this is rahter a testing or debugging feature. This can > be apply to all paths, so the variable might be "path_prefix" or > something more generic than tablespace_chroot. > > Does it make sense?
A GUC which enforces object creation does not sound like a good idea to me, and what you propose would still bite back, for example two local nodes could use the same port, but a different Unix socket path. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
