Etsuro Fujita <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 2:10 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If we don't want to change what the core code does with fdw_exprs,
>> I think the only way to fix it is to hack postgres_fdw so that it
>> won't generate plans involving the problematic case.

> Seems reasonable.

>> See attached.

> I read the patch.  It looks good to me.  I didn't test it, though.

Thanks for looking!  Have a good vacation ...

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to