On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:52 PM Souvik Bhattacherjee <kivu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your reply and sorry that I couldn't reply earlier. > Since I didn't get any response within a couple of days, I took the longer > route -- changed the lwlock.h and lwlock.c > for accommodating the lw locks for the shared hash table. > > I'll describe what I modified in the lwlock.h and lwlock.c and it seems to be > working fine. Although I haven't got an opportunity > to test it extensively. If you could let me know if I missed out anything > that might cause problems later that would be great.
Well, I can't really vouch for your code on a quick look, but it doesn't look insane. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
