Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghack...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 16:27, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: >> Thanks - what about also showing the associated non-toast table ?
> IMHO, what makes more sense is to show the name of associated toast > table in the \dt+ of the normal table. I'm not for that: it's useless information in at least 99.44% of cases. Possibly it is useful in the other direction as Justin suggests. Not sure though --- generally, if you're looking at a specific toast table, you already know which table is its parent. But maybe confirmation is a good thing. That seems off-topic for this thread though. I agree with the stated premise that \d on a toast table should show all the same information \d on a regular table would. regards, tom lane