Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Right. That's why I favor applying the change to move DSM cleanup to
> the end for now, and seeing how that goes. It could be that we'll
> eventually discover that doing it before all of the AtEOXact_BLAH
> functions have had a short at doing their thing is still too early,
> but the only concrete problem that we know about right now can be
> solved by this much-less-invasive change.
But Amit's results say that this *doesn't* fix the problem that we know
about. I suspect the reason is exactly that we need to run AtEOXact_Files
or the like before closing DSM. But we should get some Windows developer
to trace through this and identify the cause for-sure before we go
designing an invasive fix.
regards, tom lane
