On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 06:21:09PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > > Em qua, 8 de mai de 2019 às 14:19, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> > > escreveu: > >> The question is; we should support vacuumdb option for (1), i.e.,, > >> something like --index-cleanup option is added? > >> Or for (2), i.e., something like --disable-index-cleanup option is added > >> as your patch does? Or for both? > > > > --index-cleanup=BOOL > > I agree with Euler's suggestion to have a 1-1 mapping between the > option of vacuumdb and the VACUUM parameter
+1. Attached the draft version patches for both options. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
v2-0001-Add-index-cleanup-option-to-vacuumdb.patch
Description: Binary data
v2-0002-Add-truncate-option-to-vacuumdb.patch
Description: Binary data
