Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2019-05-07 09:17:11 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: >> Well, it rejiggers the way table locks are acquired for all REINDEX >> INDEX commands, not just in the CONCURRENTLY. But yea, it's probably >> easy to catch issues there on user tables.
> Pushed now.
OK. I marked the open issue as closed.
regards, tom lane
