On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:17:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Before we switch to -f out of consistency with oid2name, we should > consider Magnus' argument from > cabuevezoexaxbcymmzsnf1aqdcwovys7-chqcugry5+nsqz...@mail.gmail.com IMO: > > |I have no problem with changing it to -r. -f seems a bit wrong to me, > |as it might read as a file. And in the future we might want to implement > |the ability to take full filename (with path), in which case it would > |make sense to use -f for that.
You could also use a long option for that without a one-letter option, like --file-path or such, so reserving a one-letter option for a future, hypothetical use is not really a stopper in my opinion. In consequence, I think that that it is fine to just use -f/--filenode. Any objections or better suggestions from other folks here? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
