On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 7:49 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > Well, the point I would like to outline is that section 5.11.2 about > declarative partitioning and 5.11.3 about partitioning with > inheritance treat about two separate, independent partitioning > methods. So removing the paragraph from the declarative partitioning > section mentioning foreign keys referencing partitioned tables is > fine, because that's not the case anymore... > [snip] > ... However you are adding a paragraph for something which is > completely unrelated to the issue we are trying to fix. If I were to > add something, I think that I would be more general than what you are > trying here and just mention a link to the previous paragraph about > the caveats of inheritance as they apply to single table members of an > inheritance tree and not a full set: > "Indexes and foreign key constraint apply to single tables and not > their inheritance children, hence they have some <link>caveats</> to > be aware of."
That seems reasonable to me. Here is a patch file if that is helpful (minor typo corrected). Yours, Paul
inheritance_fk_docs_v0003.patch
Description: Binary data
