On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:58:17 +0900 Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:03:04PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > Unless I am missing something, another solution might be to use a dedicated > > role to pg_receive{xlog|wal} with synchronous_commit lower than > > remote_apply. > > Aren't you confused by the same thing as I was upthread [1]? > [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190710080423.gg1...@paquier.xyz > > remote_apply affects all sessions. So even if you use a replication > role with synchronous_commit = on and have pg_receivewal use that with > remote_apply set in postgresql.conf, then remote_apply is effective > for all the other sessions so these will still be stuck at commit > waiting for pg_receivewal to apply WAL if it is a synchronous > standby. Argh! (Sorry for the noise)