On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 8:09 PM amul sul <sula...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:03 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I started reviewing this. Here is my initial review comments: >> >> * 0001-Hash-partition-bound-equality-refactoring-v22.patch
>> However, I don't think it's a good idea to do this >> refactoring, because that would lead to duplicating the code to check >> whether two given hash bound collections are equal in >> partition_bounds_equal() and partition_hash_bounds_merge() that will >> be added by the main patch, after all. To avoid that, how about >> calling partition_bounds_equal() from partition_hash_bounds_merge() in >> the main patch, like the attached? > Agree, your changes look good to me, thanks for working on it. Cool! Thanks for reviewing! Sorry for the delay. I was busy with something else recently. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita