On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:11 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > I think slight variations don't really detract from the value of the > > product, and consider the odd variation a reminder of the diversity of > > the project. I don't suggest that we purposefully introduce spelling > > variations, or that we refrain from fixing ones that appear in code > > we're changing, but I don't see the point in changing a line for the > > sole reason of standardising the spelling of a word. > > Agreed. This always reminds me of ANALYZE vs. ANALYSE where we don't > actually document the latter :) > I didn't know about that. That's a fun one! > > > That said, I'm not a native English speaker. > > Neither am I. > I am. Consistency is nice but either reads fine to me. Only brought it up as I didn't see many other usages so seemed out of place. Regards, -- Sehrope Sarkuni Founder & CEO | JackDB, Inc. | https://www.jackdb.com/
