Hello Michael, 05.08.2019 6:15, Michael Paquier wrote: >> 9.41. OWNER_TO -> OWNER TO > This one needs a back-patch. I'll fix that separately. > I believe that all the fixes in doc/ should be back-patched too. If it's not too late, I can produce such patches for the nearest releases. >> 9.75. Point-in-Time -> Point-In-Time > Why? The original looks correct to me. acronyms.sgml contains such spelling: <term><acronym>PITR</acronym></term> <listitem> <para> <link linkend="continuous-archiving">Point-In-Time Recovery</link> (Continuous Archiving) </para> >> Also, please fix my typo (from the previous set), that was somehow >> silted through a double check. > Which one is that, please? It is likely possible that some obvious > stuff has been forgotten. "It the username successfully retrieved,..." (fix_for_fix_8.15.patch) > Committed a large bunch of this stuff. Please note that the > indentation was incorrect in a couple of places, including the change > in src/tools/msvc/. Thank you. I will check my Tab settings next time.
Best regards, Alexander
diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/auth.c b/src/backend/libpq/auth.c index 5fb1f1b7d7..3713dd2884 100644 --- a/src/backend/libpq/auth.c +++ b/src/backend/libpq/auth.c @@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ interpret_ident_response(const char *ident_response, /* * Talk to the ident server on "remote_addr" and find out who * owns the tcp connection to "local_addr" - * It the username successfully retrieved, check the usermap. + * If the username successfully retrieved, check the usermap. * * XXX: Using WaitLatchOrSocket() and doing a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() if the * latch was set would improve the responsiveness to timeouts/cancellations.
