On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 03:10:33PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:18:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> b654714 has reworked the way we handle removal of CLRF for several >> code paths, and has repeated the same code patterns to do that in 8 >> different places. Could it make sense to refactor things as per the >> attached with a new routine in common/string.c? > > Yes, I think this is a good idea.
Thanks for the review, Bruce! Tom, do you have any objections? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
