On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 11:24:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > And both make sense. > > + * Return true if channel binding was employed and the scram exchange > upper('scram')? > > Except for this nit, it looks good to me.
For the archive's sake: this has been committed as of d6e612f. - * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of these - * queries. + * We pretend that the connection is OK for the duration of + * these queries. The result had some noise diffs. Perhaps some leftover from the indentation run? That's no big deal anyway. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature