Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:28 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect
>> than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized
>> security issues.
>>
>> If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to
>> unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it
>> goes.
> It would be nice to get this fixed. Several people have been confused
> by it at this point.
I think I just forgot about this thread. Shall we change it in HEAD
and see what happens? Maybe backpatch, but not till after 12.0 is out.
regards, tom lane
